- Are radius-based territories legally enforceable in an FDD?
-
Radius-based territories are legally enforceable, but they are increasingly challenged
in disputes. Courts and arbitrators are receptive to evidence showing that a circular
territory overestimates or misrepresents actual customer access. Drive-time polygon
territories — documented with routing data — provide a more defensible basis because
they reflect how customers actually reach a location.
- What drive time should a franchise territory be?
-
Most franchise systems define primary protected territories using a 5- to 15-minute
drive-time polygon. QSR and convenience concepts typically use 5–10 minutes; casual
dining, fitness, and service franchises use 10–15 minutes; destination concepts may
extend to 20–30 minutes. The correct threshold depends on your category's
customer willingness-to-travel, established from franchisee performance data or
industry benchmarks.
- How do I prove territory overlap in a franchise dispute?
-
Territory overlap is proved by generating drive-time isochrones from each location
and measuring the area of intersection as a percentage of each polygon's total area.
DriveZone's side-by-side comparison tool generates both polygons and quantifies
overlap. The output — exported as GeoJSON, PDF, or KML — can be attached to
demand letters, FDD disclosures, or arbitration submissions as reproducible,
data-backed documentation.
- What is a protected trade area in franchising?
-
A protected trade area (also called a protected territory or exclusive territory)
is the geographic zone defined in a franchise agreement within which the franchisor
agrees not to open or license another unit of the same brand. The definition method
— whether radius or drive-time polygon — has significant implications for population
count, cannibalization risk, and territorial dispute resolution. Drive-time polygons
more accurately represent the zone of customer access and are increasingly the
standard for multi-unit franchise development agreements.